It is clear we are nearing the end of the Chavez-Maduro era: the “starting bell” is now ringing for organizations yet to establish an exploratory group tasked with assessing commercial opportunity. For those planning to participate in the recovery and reconstruction of Venezuela, it’s time to consider historical context, make reasonable comparisons (pre-Chavez vs now) regarding transformation of local cultures, current societal realities (in-country & diaspora), and focus on what comes next.
What organizations should know regarding opportunities and expected duration –
- Venezuela is a founding member of OPEC and possesses the world’s largest known oil & gas reserves, approximately 20% of the global total
- Chavez Era production peaked in 2008 at 2.4 MM BPD, currently production hovers around 700,000 BPD and declining
- Oil & Gas required annual investment = USD$15-$20 Billion, medium-term (5-10 years) – predominantly from private sources – with expectation of three (3) years to increase production to 1.5 MM BPD – per Francisco Monaldi*
- Agricultural Equipment required annual investment = USD$5 Billion, during next 5-8 years – per Hiram Gaviria*
- Transportation Infrastructure estimated annual investment = USD$10 Billion, next 5-10 years
- Electrical Power Grid investment requirement = USD$1.5 Billion – next 3 years
Who are likely candidates from the USA? We begin with Oil & Gas Exploration companies and their classic support network (Chevron is currently operating there under a US Govt waiver). Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) firms: Bechtel, Foster-Wheeler, Fluor, others, and their competent sub-contractors – teams capable of handling projects broad in scope: oil & gas facilities to transportation infrastructure, water systems, electric power plants/grids and likely some expansive agricultural/farming infrastructure. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) of earthmoving, mining, construction, power generation, agricultural, pipeline and associated machinery. Manufacturers & Suppliers of Construction Material. USA-based Service Partners engaged in rebuilding high-value capital equipment and spares for heavy industry – in Venezuela these networks, contractors and service providers have been depleted and are currently unreliable.
In my opinion, an irreversible process leading to change in government consistent with the demands of the political opposition lead by Juan Guaido, National Assembly President, will likely commence within sixty (60) days, and certainly by the end of 2019. Criteria as follows –
- El Cese de Usurpación – End of the Usurpation of Power (by Nicolas Maduro)
- Gobierno de Transición – Transitional Government based on Plan Pais model*
- Elecciones Libres – Free and Fair Elections within 9-12 months
Involving oneself in “nation building” is not a typical career discussion; however, my unique experience and strong ties to Venezuela & Latin America require a sharing & transfer of knowledge intended to accelerate relief for a traumatized population and commence a complete rebuild of their Country. Déjà vu, all over again…what happens next has been foreshadowed by what transpired two decades ago during Venezuela’s brief, and sole period of Oil & Gas industry privatization in the last 43 years.
Upon arrival in Venezuela (April 1996), I was an ExPat “operations manager” for a coal stockpile & loading facility on Lake Maracaibo: receiving product (predominantly from Colombia), sizing and loading oceangoing ships with tugboats, barges and clamshells into the holds: a process built on archaic technology, as was the reality for many sectors of society. Coincidentally, a longer-term opportunity was just ramping-up under the administration of President Rafael Caldera: Venezuela’s “Apertura Petrolera”, a privatization effort inviting multi-national companies into the Oil & Gas industry via partnerships with PDVSA and other government entities. Oil & Gas revenues were in decline following twenty years of “nationalization” (1976-1996) which left production infrastructure poorly maintained and dilapidated due to endemic corruption.
The first round of privatizations began in January 1996, and structured to leverage the capital, experience and technology investment of international partners. Bidding packages were presented on specific oil field “blocks” via long-term production leases, usually 20 years – with the government taking royalties after partner-operators met a measurable threshold, defined by unique agreements. The clock started when a partnership deal was signed. At the time, Venezuela was exporting crude at approximately 2.8 MM barrels per day, sourced mainly from mature fields on Lake Maracaibo, Cabimas and several others in Western Venezuela. By mid-1997, the vast, previously unquantified reserves in the East of the Country (Orinico Belt, Anaco, Jusepin, El Furrial, Dacion, Pariaguan, etc), were undergoing significant expansion on the shoulders of the new “private sector partners”, increasingly managing operations, exploration and refinement of the Country’s vast petroleum and natural gas deposits.
Chevron, Conoco, ENI, Total, LASMO, ExxonMobil and a multitude of other “internationals” were participating, mainly building new facilities in Eastern Venezuela with experienced, domestic contractors executing the civil works and mechanical builds under project management by competent international contractors – a classic Oil & Gas boom. The Venezuelan Government was “having it’s cake and eating it too”, overseeing a revenue-earning model with much needed investment financed predominantly by international corporations.
Enter President Hugo Chavez in February 1999, with a socialist agenda including the re-nationalization of Oil & Gas exploration, extraction, refining, and other natural resource industries: most notably coal, gold, iron ore mining and processing. Fortunately for Venezuela’s petroleum industry, three years into the front-end investment significant completion of upgrades and new facilities construction had been executed by the international partners, most were in early production mode. Over the next few years President Chavez methodically began the “buyouts” of block concessions granted under the “Apertura Petrolera”, and the Country was again subject to the “culture of corruption” that had precipitated the decline of production experienced several years prior. Chavez also had a popular revolt on his hands in response to aligning his government with Cuba. Venezuela became polarized as dissident businesses, politicians and individuals were marginalized – property and commercial interests were confiscated and placed under the management of Military leaders and Chavista loyalists. Capital flight and a “brain drain” ensued, finally capped with currency controls instituted in Q1/2005. Once again, the mismanagement, inexperience, ineptitude, corruption and lack of maintenance in the Oil & Gas sector – responsible for 85% of export revenue – set the table for another decline in production and revenues.
The similarities between Venezuela “then & now” are clear – so are the stark differences. Expectations moving forward require the recognition of a “new reality”: a country void of technical experience, competent general contractors, heavy machinery, materials and social stability. For the next several years, direct investment in Venezuela won’t be for the faint of heart, while the upside could be strong and sustained for decades.
Demand for the human capital required to competently manage the massive slate of projects will far exceed short-term supply. In my view it is naïve to expect educated and experienced Venezuelans in exile to return in large numbers, at least not quickly. Plan Pais*, a Venezuelan Exile’s think-tank based in the United States, estimates only twenty percent (or less) would consider such a commitment. They would have to see an indisputable level of national unity, reconciliation and public safety to consider repatriation. An influx of Ex-Patriot talent will be required for a minimum of several years.
Painting an accurate picture of what Venezuela will be initially must include known current challenges and expected conditions on the ground based on experience – including, but not limited to the following:
- Humanitarian Relief – immediate needs to be addressed by Governments and NGO’s while economic reconstruction is simultaneously planned and executed – expect many private businesses coming into Venezuela to include staff for community outreach and quasi-NGO activities
- Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) and Dealer Networks – international companies complete with physical presence to support the rebuild of Venezuela – example: Caterpillar currently has no in-country representation as their long-standing Dealer Agreement with Venequip, was recently voided – expect a boom of new machinery imports, all types
- Offshore Service Support & Equipment Sourcing – due to the mass exodus of Venezuelan contractors and support business in the 2003-2006 time-frame, “outsourcing” with USA-based (and other international) businesses will have representatives deployed to manage local administration & logistics serving heavy industry and others using their products – expect massive imports beginning with second-hand machinery of all types
- Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) Contractors – as with the “Apertura Petrolera”, large contractors (complete with equipment fleets) will be required to execute the construction of facilities in all sectors: Oil & Gas, Mining, Agriculture, Water Systems, Power Generation, Health Services, Education, etc – long-term operating contracts with guarantees will be required to mitigate risk and entice investment
- Oil & Gas Exploration and Production – international companies will arrive in droves to bid on long-term contracts in this industry and other infrastructure projects – natural resource wealth will serve as collateral for direct foreign investment, crafted with financial instruments to guarantee performance of all parties
- Dollarization of Economy – happening now (by necessity) and likely to become an interim policy for the transitional government, remaining until economic stability is achieved
- Security, Public Safety & Bad Actors – upon regime change Nicolas Maduro, top level political cronies, Venezuelan military brass and security forces, Cuban influencers will depart, be taken into custody and/or fracture into formidable elements bent on survival until they are dealt with depending on agreements, reconciliation attempts and public sentiment. Under Hugo Chavez, many private businesses were expropriated and handed over to military brass, thereby politicizing the armed forces and empowering leaders to manage graft and their own enrichment – Colectivos, Cuban-style civil obedience enforcer groups will be disbanded and disarmed – Colombian guerilla groups (FARC) operating in Western Venezuela on the Colombia Border and (ELN) profiteering via wildcat gold mining mainly in Eastern Bolivar State, likely dealt with via limited military incursion
- Military Rank & File – lower level officers and their subordinates will be needed in restructuring the National Guard and Security Forces loyal to the transitional and future governments – prior to the ascension of Hugo Chavez, the armed forces were a neutral body, expect a future Constitution to restore that status
- Socio-Economic Inequality – fighting corruption and inequality (not socialism) were the principal planks of Hugo Chavez’s original campaign in 1998: a winning message resonating with the vast-majority of the population, desperate for relief from the scourge of corruption and perpetual relegation into poverty – no solution can be considered “long-term” without addressing these issues in a way which instills confidence and trust within the disenfranchised
- Chavismo as a Political Force – Hugo Chavez was a charismatic phenomenon, and a logical human response to many decades of poor governance and disregard for the masses by the “connected elite”. To that end, Chavismo will never die in Venezuela because it represents “gained ground”, hope and true representation for those previously marginalized. Much like the FARC peace accord of 2016 in Colombia, a “reconciliation with reality” is required to lend legitimacy and empower the political voice of those who subscribe to the fairness principles of the Chavismo vision
- Culture of Corruption & Descension into Criminality – a sensitive issue in any country, but very real and thriving in Venezuela decades before the emergence of Hugo Chavez, the Socialist rhetoric and grandiose projects during the early years (perfect with abnormally elevated crude-oil prices) fueled even more opportunities for graft by cronies and a newly politicized military elite charged with managing confiscated private businesses. By the time President Chavez was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (2011), he was already surrounded by a close-knit group of beneficiaries and enablers who were so entrenched and enriched via their corruption, there was no breaking their grip on power: enter Nicolas Maduro (2013). For the self-proclaimed “Son of Chavez”, hapless to prevent the downward spiral of institutionalized corruption & criminality, finding new revenue sources was a priority. In the last several years, wildcat gold mining, the drug trade and “refuge for protection” deals with Colombian rebel groups have provided much-needed cash flow, as have massive loans from China and Russia based on repayment via natural resources yet to be extracted. Ineptitude, greed and a willingness to remain in power “at all costs” has ensured a recovery cannot succeed under the Maduro regime, and led to US Sanctions (August) currently stifling all forms of trade and designed to force imminent change
- Crimes Against Humanity – repression and Human Rights abuses on a criminal scale have now been officially documented (July) by the United Nations OHCHR* – including 6,800 “resistance to authority” killings in 2018 alone – leaving many in the highest circles of power petrified of their likely fate and seeking to make eleventh-hour deals – when the boxes are checked for outside forces to take action in recovery of a failed State, this ranks highly
- Organization of America States & TIAR* – last week the OAS convened to discuss and approve the request of the Venezuela Interim-Government, led by Juan Guaido, to invoke the “Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance”, allowing for military intervention into Venezuelan Territory – this does not mean it will happen, but now serves as another pressure point on the Maduro-Chavista regime. In my view Colombian Armed Forces will cross Venezuela’s Western Border (at some point) in pursuit of FARC guerillas who receive safe-haven there – current political rhetoric out of Colombia alludes to the threat
- Plan Pais & Institutional Change – identifying the need for rebuilding Venezuelan institutions across all sectors – public & private – this organization’s roadmap serves as the basis of public discourse by National Assembly Member & Interim President, Juan Guaido, and on behalf of Venezuela’s opposition government. The most contentious and complicated issue, without question, will be the reversal of private property and business confiscations, a common policy tool of the Chavez Regime in the 2002-2008 period
As I position my company to participate, lead and partner in reconstruction efforts, it’s critical we share relevant experience, cultural knowledge and recent events to assess opportunities and create realistic expectations. Contact me at your convenience to discuss your interest and how we may partner.
*Links and References –
Francisco Monaldi (Plan Pais event, Tampa, March 23rd) – https://youtu.be/zZ2ioUHQgds
Hiram Gaviria (Plan Pais event, Caracas, February 1st) – https://youtu.be/rCNbMPS2L7A
Washington Post (September 15th) – OAS Treaty Invoked https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/fears-of-military-conflict-between-venezuela-and-colombia-as-tensions-over-maduro-government-escalate/2019/09/15/c2a4ff88-d621-11e9-9610-fb56c5522e1c_story.html?noredirect=on
Bloomberg (August 2nd) – US Blockade/Quarantine – https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-02/u-s-headed-toward-blockade-of-venezuela-trump-official-says?utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-politics&utm_medium=social&utm_content=politics
Wilbur Ross (August 1st) – US Commerce Secretary – https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-venezuela-reconstruction-idUSKCN1UR4GS
United Nations Human Rights Council, OHCHR Report (July 5th) – https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/07/1041902
Plan Pais – Tampa Event Summary (March 22nd – 23rd) – https://www.planpais.com/segmentos2019.html
As we monitor the ongoing political power-struggle, humanitarian crisis and breakdown of basic public services, one thing is clear: Venezuela will require a massive rebuild of their government, financial and oil and gas sectors, transportation infrastructure, water systems, food production capabilities, among others. The Country’s “opposition in-exile” has developed a plan to remove the current government from power and address the complex array of challenges facing their population – the organization is “Plan Pais” and they have a conference here in Tampa, March 22-23, 2019 – take a look…
While Plan Pais has existed as an organization since 2011, “Interim President” Juan Guaidó brought it to the fore in late-January, and, addressed staff and supporters at a Plan Pais news conference in Caracas on February 1, 2019. Mr Guaido references the strategies of the organization regularly in his public speeches with thoughtful detail, while self-exiled Venezuelans manage international support from the United States and dozens more Nations around the world.
Notwithstanding recent events, change will come, and soon Venezuelans will be faced with a “complete rebuild” of their economy and social structures as they navigate the “undoing” of twenty years of administrative mismanagement under the Chavez & Maduro regimes. Prior to the Plan Pais news conference in Caracas (February 1st) a reporter interviewed Hiram Gaviria, National Assembly member and career agronomist. Explaining the critical need to reconstruct Venezuela’s ability to feed its population, Mr Gaviria stated the estimated requirement for agricultural equipment in Venezuela to be US$5Billion annually for the next 5-8 years (https://youtu.be/rCNbMPS2L7A). Expect that budget to be multiplied many times over in both the Oil & Gas and Transportation Infrastructure sectors.
Mister Maquinaria will be represented at the Tampa conference this week and seeks discussion with global partners who recognize this unique opportunity to take part in the stabilization, recovery and expansion of the Venezuela society and economic engines. Having lived, worked and married in Venezuela (1996 – 2002), I am keen to be a part of the reconstruction of the Country specific to my experience in the oil and gas sector, transportation infrastructure, and other sectors based on priorities established by Plan Pais. Please contact me with interest and let’s have a chat!
A seismic-shift is underway in Venezuela, with myriad implications worldwide. This is “Cuba on steroids”, with the titanic exception of a population “who once had everything” in a globally connected society, then “lost everything” under exceptionally poor governance, all while continuing to preside over unparalleled concentrations of natural resource wealth.
For those who understand the culture, society and follow events in Venezuela, the current situation and accelerated demise of President Maduro’s “Chavista” regime has a ring of finality – an overdue outcome to witness, study and document. Venezuela’s “next government” and entire Western Hemisphere, must have a cohesive plan moving forward. It appears the early chapters of transition were already written, now playing out coinciding with significant historical, recent & upcoming events:
· – Juan Guaidó chosen to lead the Venezuela National Assembly, an elected body widely recognized as the only remaining entity with a mandate from the people
· – President Maduro’s inauguration for a second, six-year term based on a rigged-election in May 2018, and boycotted by the opposition
· – mass demonstrations across the Country and embassies around the world to coincide with this date in 1958 when a civilian-military movement overthrew the government of the Country’s last dictator, General Marcos Pérez Jiménez
· – Caracas, Juan Guaidó, speaking to tens of thousands of supporters at the main opposition rally, declares himself “acting” President of Venezuela (referencing a clause in the current Constitution to legitimize the action) – his claim quickly recognized by the Organization of American States (OAS) and several governments, including Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and United States
· – President Maduro (now disputed) announces cutting diplomatic ties with the United States: all embassy personnel ordered to leave within 72 hours; subsequently, “acting” President Juan Guaidó requests the United States diplomatic mission remain in the Country
· – deadline looms per “disputed” President Maduro’s call for all United States diplomatic personnel to depart Venezuela
· – in eight days-time, the 20th anniversary of the first Inauguration of President Hugo Chavez – for “Chavistas” and opposition followers, a significant date
It is clear Venezuela’s “opposition in-exile” had a plan developed to remove the current government from power, finally set in-play by a convergence of events favorable for launch. Today, confrontations loom as “acting President” Juan Guaidó has stated “demonstrations and rallies will continue until liberty is achieved”. The current situation is complex but not surprising – if scripted, a compelling end to the “Chavista Era” would culminate with Nicolas Maduro standing down at the recommendation of the Armed Forces, “acting President” Juan Guaidó addressing the nation on February 2nd, calling for national peace and reconciliation, detailing the structure and actions of his transitional government, addressing the current humanitarian crisis, plan to stabilize the economy, and announcing a firm date for fresh elections later this year. The appearance of a democratic path for a peaceful transition per the Venezuelan Constitution has allowed increased international pressure which, in my view, will become overwhelming for the Maduro Regime.
President Maduro must have received the message that violent suppression of opposition dissidents at his direction, or otherwise on his watch, would bring dire consequences to himself and his “Chavista” cronies. In fact, the International Criminal Court (ICC), has a pending request by six neighboring Countries to initiate an investigation on crimes against humanity allegedly committed in the territory of Venezuela since February 12, 2014. The rank and file of Venezuela’s Armed Forces have no stomach for committing atrocities domestically, nor defending “La Patria” from regional military forces (supported by the United States) whose abilities dwarf their own experience, competency and power. Colombia comes to mind, Venezuela’s neighbor to the West and “cultural sister”, as a Peace-Keeper of good will.
Nicolas Maduro – uncharismatic, weak, inept – was always a strawman for the corrupt political beneficiaries enabled and entrenched by Hugo Chavez. The legacy and cohesion sustained under Chavez died with him in March 2013, and the fuse lit for the regime’s eventual demise.
Regardless of imminent events, change will come, and soon Venezuelans will be faced with a “complete rebuild” of their economy and social structures as they navigate the “undoing” of twenty years of administrative mismanagement, squandering of natural resources, embezzlement, fascism, thuggery and corruption. Having lived in Venezuela “before-during-after” Hugo Chavez’s ascension to power, my experience suggests there will be a powerful and admirable effort on the part of those who remained behind (a majority with no other choice) and those who fled & return quickly, to work for peace and reconciliation. National unity is another matter, a longer-term goal that is required before many others who departed – Venezuelan Nationals, business partners, etc – will feel secure enough to return.
Securing the deal to rebuild 6 x CAT 789, 240-Ton Capacity Mining Trucks several years ago was a satisfying professional experience – to date these remain the largest machines ever rebuilt by Ring Power CAT. Freight from the BHP Mine in Chile was expertly handled by an experienced logistics group, leaving the beds behind – rebuilds from the frame-up across all units were complete in about five months after some change orders – they sold to Queensland, Australia in Q2/2012 – let’s do that again starting with mining components!
This Volvo L350F spent it’s “first life” in a Bio-Fuel operation in the Deep South, one of three (3) equipped with Wicker Logging Grapples: all over 16,000 hours. We took them in-trade, sold the first to another USA-based Dealer and the remaining two (2) units to this Brazilian customer who owns several quarries, produces huge granite slabs, polishes, preps and containerizes for export worldwide – one source for your fine granite countertops!
Turks & Caicos (Summer 2016) – It’s brutally hot most summer days and sometimes unbearably humid in the Islands of the Caribbean, but the perpetual challenge for builders/developers is lack of dealer support on this outlying archipelago. While the dealer in the Dominican Republic was the “dealer of record” for this Island Nation, they have no brick and mortar operations there, and no Service Techs with VISA’s to enter the Country: we stepped in and filled the void.
Our customer needed to acquire a late-model machine to fulfill their dire need of a 30+ Metric-Ton excavator – we provided this Volvo EC340DL (Tie IV-interim) and the support required to ensure it would function as intended, thus our first “de-tiering” project was slated and planned.
The mechanical work was fairly simple, approximately five (5) hours by an experienced Service Technician: partial removal of original ex-factory emissions equipment, install of replacement parts, documenting the process, etc.
The process was only complicated by some on-site broadband and cell coverage issues, which were expertly managed and overcome by our team. Reprogramming of the ECU was then an easy final task.
One year on this “de-tiered” hydraulic excavator is working as intended and meeting the needs of our customer with no reported incidents…who’s next?
The Issue – Having experienced the arrival and implications of Tier IV-interim engines in the USA market I can tell you it’s been a game changer! Several years ago this was a conceptual discussion and today it is reality as used inventories across all makes and models become an issue for dealers, their rental fleets and contractors who purchased this machinery between 2010 – 2014. The historic flow of used construction equipment from USA-based fleets to owners mainly in Latin America and Africa has all but halted as weary international buyers avoid late-model Tier IV-interim machines with emissions equipment and require special low-Sulphur fuel.
The Solution: Conversion and Export – the best way to resolve the issue of bloated inventories is to convert Tier IV-Interim machines by removing the emissions equipment, reprogramming on-board computers and making them ready for use in traditional USA markets.
The best solution I have seen to date comes from Volvo and involves the complete removal of all emissions equipment “downstream” of the turbo, plugging the appropriate holes, installing a traditional muffler/exhaust pipe and finally, re-programming the computer to “tell” the engine it is now a “Tier Zero” capable of utilizing diesel fuels available in international markets. Why is this the best I have seen to date? In short because after conversion, the machines will “look and feel” like the same models being delivered to those markets by local dealers. Anything else would be met with skepticism and angst by mechanics on the ground. Currently Volvo promotes the conversion being performed by Volvo Dealers in the country of destination and use…for that matter, all manufacturers have the same message as they navigate the waters of compliance with EPA guidelines versus a strong desire to reconstruct the historic flow of used equipment out of the USA market.
Other manufacturers are not as focused on finding a solution as far as we can tell. Brands like Caterpillar and John Deere are staunch advocates of keeping dealers focused on “in-channel” solutions. Caterpillar in particular does not promote any scenario whereby a USA Dealer would be involved in the sale and use of USA-based equipment to another market: in the eyes of Caterpillar that job is for CAT Used Equipment Services Inc (CUESI). This leaves the de-tiering of these other brands in the hands of independent shops, “after-market” kits, and lacks the critical software required to re-program onboard computers. In my view not sound options as they could compromise the functionality and performance of the equipment.
“Value” should replace “Price” when it comes to acquiring machinery, here is what astute buyers should consider
- Original Quality – machinery which is built to last and well-designed on many levels is optimal. Aside from ease of maintenance, parts availability and dealer support – one major factor should be operator comfort – ergonomics – which serves owners well without increased production and a machine likely to be maintained well by a content operator.
- Acquisition Costs – the initial purchase price, delivery logistics and nationalization costs all factor when buying a machine for import into your Country. While currency exchange rates and local economic issues also play a role, buying assets when the “market of origin” offers special deals is key: be flexible and study the source economy and availability machines with your trusted source
- Intent and Use – The working application and expected hours the buyer will use the machine is critical when making intelligent choices. Machines of lesser “original quality” may be the best decision and justification for an owner who will use the machine sporadically. Conversely, a project or application implying high-usage in a production environment calls for a solid machine with a reputation for “uptime”
- Fuel Economy – on a daily basis owners observe and manage fuel and operating costs. Machines which use less fuel for the same work when compared to competitive models demonstrate quickly why upgrading to a more fuel efficient machine should always be a consideration. Many owners never consider that fuel economy can vary greatly. Research will show is does: the daily costs of fuel and even the act of refueling a machine in a production environment will affect overall productivity.
Considering these four components when researching machinery with assure the best value when your acquisition is made!
For many contractors and other users of heavy earthmoving equipment, the prospect of acquiring a machine from a trusted source and importing into their country is a daunting task. Many customers choose to leave that to brokers domiciled in their own country or more broadly to third-parties in the USA where the machinery originates. This process of importing heavy equipment is not as cumbersome as one may believe and “doing it yourself” with the assistance of experienced professionals will usually garner a better value for the end-user. Here is what you should know when it comes to acquiring and importing heavy equipment:
- A) Quoting and Acquisition – while there are many sources it is my experience that buying used equipment from an authorized dealer rental fleet should be the first choice. These machines are generally maintained per factory specifications by such dealers and offer quality machinery with good maintenance history, documented. Whether one deals directly with a dealer or via a trusted USA-based broker, rental fleet units are generally superior to other machines in the marketplace or advertised on the internet and via other media.
- B) Freight Forwarding – to manage the transport of equipment from your “port of embarkation” or, “where it departs the USA” to the chosen port of entry in your country where machines will be put to work, the network of proficient agents is substantial. These “freight forwarders” have the expertise to manage the logistics, clear US Customs and even perform the same functions within your country and to your jobsite or final destination. Using established freight forwarders knowledgeable in importing heavy equipment is recommended in order to avoid pitfalls which may cause delays in delivery and spending more money on this process. I have some recommendations based on a long history of superior service and performance. Concord International, Energy Systems and Hansen Shipping are three companies I feel confident referring
- C) Customs Brokerage – handling the intricacies of “nationalization” and associated tasks for importing heavy equipment into your Country should be performed by local firms as they are much more familiar with administrative process and more agile when working through potential obstacles. It is common for freight forwarding and customs brokerage activities to be managed by one organization, this is the preferred provider; a firm which has an office and local personnel doing the job.
I believe that empowering buyers to manage their own search, acquisition and delivery of equipment is the next step in the natural evolution within our industry, and I am here to assist.